Massachusetts lawmakers have delayed the legalization of online casino gaming after the Joint Committee on Economic Development and Emerging Technologies voted unanimously to refer the proposal for further study. The move effectively pauses efforts to authorize digital casino games in the state for the 2026 legislative session.
The committee’s 11-0 vote on H 4431 included eight Democrats and two Republicans, while two members—Democrat Rep. Greg Schwartz and Republican Rep. Kenneth Sweezey—did not participate. Rep. David Muradian Jr., who introduced the bill, highlighted that residents are already participating in online wagering without regulatory oversight. “There are no consumer protections, no responsible gaming standards, and the bill will change that,”Muradian said during the committee hearing in November 2025.
Future Plans for H 4431
Despite the setback, Muradian expressed optimism about the bill’s prospects in future sessions. He said, “The momentum H4431 created this session will hopefully serve as a springboard to future economic growth in Massachusetts, while always focusing on consumer protections and safeguards.” The proposed legislation included several measures aimed at player safety, such as a $20,000 deposit limit in a 24-hour period and requirements for operators to monitor gambling behaviors.
Had it advanced, H 4431 would have permitted online table games, slots, poker, peer-to-peer, and skill-based games under the supervision of the Massachusetts Gaming Commission (MGC). Existing casinos in the state—operated by PENN Entertainment, MGM Resorts International, and Wynn Resorts—would have been eligible for online licenses and could have partnered with third-party operators to run up to three “skins” each. Licensed operators would have been taxed at 15% of adjusted gross revenue.
Impact on Current Operators and Neighboring States
The vote to study the bill provides relief to online sweepstakes casino operators currently in a legal gray area. H 4431 would have banned dual-currency sweepstakes gaming that imitates casino, lottery, or sports betting. Supporters of legalization argued that the measure could help regulate an existing black market and generate additional revenue for Massachusetts. Neighboring states have already moved ahead with iGaming; Connecticut permits online gaming, while Maine passed legislation in December 2025, though its market faces a legal challenge from Churchill Downs Inc.
Meanwhile, Massachusetts has begun expanding digital gambling options through the iLottery program. Gov. Maura Healey signed legislation in 2024 to enable online lottery games, with Aristocrat Interactive selected to deliver both draw tickets and eInstant games this year. Treasurer and Lottery Commission Chair Deb Goldberg noted concerns that online casino offerings could compete with iLottery revenue, stating, “We won’t be able to compete in terms of advertising. So I, right now, am firmly against iGaming.”
Sports Betting Reform Also Under Consideration
Separately, Massachusetts is reviewing changes to its regulated online sports betting market. Senate Bill 302, passed by the same committee that deferred the iCasino bill, proposes raising the tax rate from 20% to 51%, banning live in-game and prop bets, imposing wagering limits, and restricting advertising, including a ban during live broadcasts. These reforms indicate the state is continuing to shape its broader online gambling framework while delaying full-scale iCasino legalization.
Source:
“Massachusetts Internet Casino Bill Halted In Committee”, yahoo.com, March 17, 2026
The post Massachusetts Puts Online Casino Bill on Hold first appeared on RealMoneyAction.com.
