New York lawmakers are considering legislation that would establish a formal review of proposition betting, as concern grows over its impact on sports integrity and athlete welfare. Senate Bill 10153, introduced by Sen. Jeremy Zellner, has been referred to the Senate Committee on Racing, Gaming, and Wagering, marking a new step in the state’s ongoing examination of sports wagering practices.
The proposal focuses heavily on “under” prop bets, where wagers are placed on athletes failing to meet statistical benchmarks such as points scored or strikeouts recorded. Lawmakers say these bets present distinct risks due to their reliance on individual performance outcomes.
Proposed Structure of the Review Body
The bill calls for the creation of a four-member proposition betting task force within the Rockefeller Institute. Appointments would be split between the governor, the state Assembly, and the Senate. Members would serve without compensation.
The task force would examine the volume and types of “under” bets offered in New York, along with their economic effects on operators and the wider betting market. It would also assess potential risks to game integrity, impacts on athletes and consumers, and the role of monitoring systems used to detect suspicious activity.
In addition, the group would explore possible policy responses and evaluate whether proposed solutions could reduce harm linked to these wagers. Its scope would extend beyond “under” bets to proposition betting more broadly.
The New York State Gaming Commission and licensed sportsbooks would be required to supply relevant data. The task force may also hold public hearings and consult stakeholders from gambling oversight, sports organizations, academic research, and economic fields.
If approved, findings would be submitted to the governor and legislature by December 31, 2026, with the task force dissolving 90 days after reporting.
Integrity and Athlete Concerns
The bill states prop bets are “uniquely vulnerable to abuse and manipulation.” It references cases involving Jontay Porter, Terry Rozier, Luis Ortiz, and Emmanuel Clase, along with NCAA athletes tied to performance manipulation.
Lawmakers point to repeated incidents where athletes underperform or exit games early, affecting “under” wagers. The proposal also cites concerns raised by the NCAA and NFL, and notes that several states have restricted college player prop bets.
Economic Debate and National Context
The bill requires analysis of potential fiscal impacts from restricting prop bets. Similar debates have emerged elsewhere. Louisiana withdrew a proposal after estimating up to $21 million in lost annual tax revenue, while Colorado dropped a prop bet ban due to revenue concerns.
In Colorado, sports betting tax revenue supports state programs, underscoring the financial stakes of regulation decisions.
New York’s effort comes amid wider scrutiny of sports betting. Governor Kathy Hochul has launched a 10-year gambling study, and regulators have signaled possible changes to bet types. Other bills in the state propose limiting wagers to final outcomes or expanding betting categories.
Broader Regulatory Divide
Across the United States, approaches to proposition betting vary widely. Some states have restricted or banned certain bets, while others continue to expand offerings, reflecting an uneven regulatory landscape.
New York’s proposal adds to ongoing debates over balancing market growth, revenue considerations, and integrity concerns in a rapidly expanding betting sector.
Source:
“New York bill would create prop bet task force to study risks”, sbcamericas.com, May 1, 2026
The post New York Forms Task Force to Review Prop Bets first appeared on RealMoneyAction.com.