A federal judge has ruled that Utah can enforce its anti-gambling laws against Kalshi’s sports prediction contracts, rejecting the company’s argument that federal commodities oversight prevents state intervention. The decision adds to a growing US dispute over whether sports event contracts qualify as federally regulated financial products or state-regulated gambling.
US District Judge Robert J. Shelby granted Utah’s motion for summary judgment and rejected Kalshi’s February lawsuit. Kalshi had sought protection from potential enforcement, arguing that its federal registration shielded its sports contracts from Utah gambling restrictions.
Federal Law Does Not Override Utah Gambling Ban
Shelby found that the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) does not prevent Utah from applying its gambling laws. His decision cited the history of state gambling regulation and concluded that Congress did not eliminate that authority through commodities legislation enacted after the 2008 financial crisis.
“Given the [Commodity Exchange Act’s] framework and the history of State regulation of gambling, the court cannot conclude the CEA is so pervasive that there is no room for the State of Utah to supplement it,” Shelby wrote.
The judge also determined that “the federal law relied upon by Kalshi does not preempt Utah’s ability to enforce its anti-gambling laws.”
Utah prohibits gambling, including sports betting, and online gambling remains a third-degree felony. Attorney General Derek Brown said the state’s constitutional ban protects families.
“You can’t rebrand illegal gambling as a federal commodity, and today a federal judge agreed with us,” Utah Attorney General Derek Brown said. “Kalshi bet that clever branding would beat Utah law. Kalshi lost and Utah won.”
Kalshi Plans To Appeal Decision
Kalshi offers contracts tied to sports outcomes, including game winners, point margins, losing streaks, player touchdowns and Super Bowl performers. Shelby determined that federal registration did not remove those contracts from Utah’s jurisdiction.
Kalshi had warned that Utah could pursue criminal enforcement. Spokesperson Jacki McGavick said the company will challenge the decision.
“We disagree with today’s decision and will appeal,” Jacki McGavick said in an email. “Multiple courts have already recognized that prediction markets fall under exclusive federal jurisdiction, and we will continue to defend that position.”
Shelby rejected the argument that complying with federal and state requirements would be impossible. “Adding an additional category of prohibited participants in a sports-related event contract does not appear to be onerous,” Shelby wrote. “In short, Kalshi has not shown that compliance with both federal and state law is impossible.”
Decision Adds To Wider Prediction-Market Fight
Utah’s position received support from 23 federally recognized tribes and several gaming associations. The dispute follows restrictions Kalshi has faced in Nevada and Michigan.
The case forms part of broader litigation involving sports prediction markets, with recent developments in Minnesota, Wisconsin and New York. State regulators generally classify these contracts as sports betting, while Kalshi and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission maintain that federal law governs them.
Kalshi’s sports contracts remain available in Utah for now. An appeal could delay enforcement.
Shelby concluded that the CEA “provides for some State regulation.”
Source:
“Federal judge rules Utah anti-gambling laws apply to Kalshi sports betting”, cachevalleydaily.com, August 4, 2026
The post Utah Judge Rules Gambling Laws Apply to Kalshi first appeared on RealMoneyAction.com.